Home Forum Politics, Development, and Nature’s Fury

Politics, Development, and Nature’s Fury

252
0
SHARE

Uttarakhand’s Ecological Crisis

By Col Bhaskar Bharti (Retd)

Introduction

The devastating cloudbursts and flash floods of recent days have once again exposed Uttarakhand’s extreme ecological vulnerability. What should have been natural seasonal weather has turned into large-scale destruction—because fragile Himalayan systems have been destabilised by reckless development. This is not a random act of nature. It is the direct outcome of political choices, short-sighted planning, and vested interests that ignored ecological warnings. The time for complacency is over.

Fault Lines of Development

Highways and Infrastructure

Projects like the Char-Dham Highway, executed with aggressive slope cutting, tree felling, and blasting, have turned sensitive mountains into landslide zones. Roads meant for pilgrims and tourists are now corridors of vulnerability.

Hydropower Projects

Dozens of dams and tunnels have altered river systems, choked sediment flows, and destabilised riverbanks. Instead of providing “clean energy,” many of these projects have magnified disaster impacts.

Deforestation and Land-Use Change

The destruction of forests for roads, dams, and townships has removed the natural barriers that once absorbed excess rainfall and prevented erosion.

Urbanisation and Tourism Pressure

Hotels, resorts, and concrete townships have mushroomed in ecologically sensitive zones, far exceeding carrying capacities. Mass tourism has been promoted at the cost of long-term sustainability.

The Human, Economic, and Ecological Costs

  • Lives Lost: Villages wiped out, families displaced, communities fractured.
  • Economy Hit: Infrastructure rebuilt at enormous cost, fertile land destroyed, livelihoods disrupted.
  • Nature Scarred: Forests degraded, river courses altered, biodiversity under threat.

Each disaster leaves scars deeper than the previous one. Reconstruction is no longer sustainable—it is becoming a cycle of loss.

Policy Priorities: A Pragmatic Way Forward

Development with Ecological Prudence

Halt reckless mega-projects.

Enforce independent, scientific, and transparent Environmental Impact Assessments.

Restore Natural Buffers

Massive reforestation and watershed restoration programmes.

Protect slopes and riverbanks with natural, not concrete, solutions.

Regulate Tourism and Urban Expansion

Impose strict carrying capacity limits.

Incentivise eco-tourism instead of unregulated mass tourism.

Build Resilience, Not Just Roads

Invest in disaster-resilient infrastructure and early warning systems.

Train local communities in disaster preparedness.

Depoliticise Ecology

Stop treating fragile Himalayan ecology as a bargaining chip for votes.

Establish an independent Himalayan Ecology Council with the power to review, regulate, and veto projects that endanger sustainability.

Learning from Others: Global and Domestic Models

States and countries across the world have already demonstrated pathways for balancing development with ecological sensitivity. Kerala, post its 2018 floods, commissioned expert committees to regulate quarrying, restrict constructions in flood plains, and implement watershed restoration. Japan has embedded disaster preparedness into every level of planning, from zoning laws to infrastructure design. The European Alps have revived ecological zoning, restricted mass tourism, and promoted controlled eco-tourism as a sustainable alternative.

Environmentalists and social organisations in Uttarakhand too have long advocated a shift towards low-impact, community-led development – emphasising watershed conservation, slope stabilisation, and traditional water management. These voices must now be mainstreamed into policymaking.

Crucially, new mega projects such as the Rispana–Bindal Elevated Road, Aerial Ropeway projects, Four-Laning Project and Large Tunneling projects should be put on immediate hold. Instead of multiplying vulnerabilities through fresh construction, Uttarakhand must focus on consolidating existing infrastructure and preserving the sanctity of its ecology. Development must be redefined—not as expansion into fragile zones, but as strengthening resilience, sustainability, and ecological harmony.

Uttarakhand at the Crossroads of Survival

The disasters in Uttarakhand are not nature’s wrath alone—they are the verdict on years of reckless, politically motivated decisions. Policymakers must recognise that development at the cost of ecology is not progress, it is self-destruction. It is now or never. The Devbhoomi is sending clear alarms and may not give us more lease time to react. If leaders continue to place vested interests above ecological survival, history will condemn this generation as insensitive, arrogant, and blind to the lessons of nature. The mool mantra for Uttarakhand’s future must be restoration, preservation, and consolidation of existing infrastructure, thereby safeguarding the fragile ecology. This is the only path to ensure that the Himalayas remain a living source of faith, culture, and sustenance for generations to come. We owe this land to our next generations—not as a graveyard of mistakes, but as a living Himalaya that sustains life, faith, and culture. Political leaders must rise above short-term politics and embrace long-term ecological responsibility. Anything less will be remembered as betrayal.

(The author is an army veteran and a social commentator. He is an alumnus of National Defence Academy and Indian Military Academy. He is a Postgraduate in HRM and Journalism and Mass Communication. He is based in Dehradun.)