The riot that took place in Sambhal over the mosque survey issue is indicative of a desire to provoke a communal divide in Uttar Pradesh for political reasons. It is an attempt to take advantage of the distrust in constitutional institutions among a section of the people. Considering the historical reality, there is fear among some that many masjids dating back to the Mughal period could be declared as built upon temple remains. This was definitely a practice in the past but its relevance to the present is questionable. There is no doubt that much of India’s Muslim population comprises those converted many generations ago, but how would that change the present reality? History cannot be changed but can be better understood. In the social context, that is the need of the hour.
Politically, it is important for people to stop favouring those who wish to exploit religious divides. Muslims, in particular, should not be the captive votebank of the so-called ‘secular’ parties. This would not only provide them with better representation in the elected bodies but also help break the stereotypes that define them. They should look for good leaders, irrespective of which religion or community they may belong.
The politicians that exploit religious sentiments to instigate riots should realise that it is no longer possible to do so without repercussions. The old anonymity of the crowd is no longer available no matter how many CCTV cameras are damaged, or TV news crews attacked. Not only does the reality of the event get speedily exposed, but the perpetrators are quite easily identified. Posts over social media can be tracked to the actual instigators, who can be made accountable. Also, the police are relatively better equipped to thwart designs to bring about communal clashes. The planned riot as a political tool is rapidly decreasing in value. (Genuine outbreaks of violence, it must be noted, are different and relatively harder to control or prevent.)
Those who wish to protect their mosques should do so in the courts where it would be most effective. They should develop the ability to present the right arguments – of which there are many. Politicians and property dealers should not be allowed to exploit communal differences for personal profit. There should also be an honest acknowledgement of the past, through which there can be accommodation in the present – it should not be considered defeat.
